Cognitive taste

The most deplorable iPhone app of all

offenderlocatorAs of today, the #4 bestselling paid app in Apple’s entire iPhone store is “Offender Locator,” by ThinAir Wireless, which links into your GPS and maps the registered sex offenders near you. A couple of mainstream articles have discussed the pros and cons of “Offender Locator,” but none has mentioned the fact that the app names and locates some people who were convicted only of the crime of sodomy.

Although state laws that make consensual gay sex illegal were ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2003 in Lawrence v. Texas, they remain on the books in many states. In some of those states, people who were convicted under state sodomy laws are still required to register as sex offenders, and are flagged by “Offender Locator.”

For example, a Ridgeland, Mississippi man that “Offender Locator” warns you about was convicted in 1994 of “Unnatural Intercourse” under Mississippi Code § 97-29-59, that state’s anti-sodomy law, which still stands and has been held to prohibit both consensual gay sex and consensual heterosexual oral sex. And under § 45-33-23, that man is still required to register as a sex offender. According to a website published by the state of Mississippi listing registered sex offenders, the man’s information was current as of June 24, 2009.

In spite of the Lawrence decision, some states have not just left anti-sodomy laws on the books but even used them as the basis for arrests. In 2008, two men in Raleigh, North Carolina, were charged with a “Crime Against Nature” in connection with a domestic dispute. Although the charges were later dropped, one of the men lost his $450 bail bond fee. Three years earlier, North Carolina state senator Ellie Kinnaird (D-Orange) had introduced legislation to eliminate the “Crime Against Nature” law on the grounds that anti-sodomy laws are now unconstitutional under Lawrence, but her bill died in the state legislature.

Among other people required to register as sex offenders, and would thus also be subject to listing in the iPhone app, would be teenagers convicted of statutory rape—for example, in Massachusetts, where I went to high school, that might include a 17-year-old high school senior that had sex with his 15-1/2-year-old girlfriend, a fellow senior. That’s not a thought experiment—it’s a real case, and a motion to dismiss it was denied; if convicted, this boy will wind up on “Offender Locator,” too.

The imperfections in our rule of criminal law have resulted in many wrongs through the years. Gay and lesbian people have suffered more than most. Yet decisions like Lawrence give us hope that as a society awakens to the possibility of tolerance, our rule of law can, in time, become less imperfect.

Perhaps ThinAir Wireless would plead neutrality—that it aims simply to make public information more accessible. Yes, these sex offender registries were already online, and, in theory, already public. But the app’s menacing logo and the way it conveys information—representing people convicted of being gay as GPS dots flashing across your map, like obstacles in a video game—tell a different, more public, more accessible story. “Offender Locator” is not just one more cruel punishment for people that have already been maltreated by centuries of codified intolerance; it is, in its novel use of technology, unusual in its cruelty.


  1. I feel that if someones BORN sexual preference such as GAY can be published then its only fair that Heterosexual acts are published as well! This is Discrimination at its best! Why is someone’s personal sexual preference being placed for the public eye to see? I feel that people who reside in these states, who pay taxes to there states have every right to challenge this. I personally would not pay my hard earned money to a state have someone slander my name & reputation. I am OUTRAGED by this! This is why Gays need to stand up and fight for their rights.

  2. just seems a bit sad and over the top to be honest – a little bit more of live and let live would not go amiss in this world. Someones sex preferences ie if they are straight or gay should not be on display to the world. Its just wrong that we label people in this way – if we all the same, sex preference, likes, dislikes and beliefs and so on wouldnt the world be a boring place?

  3. I personally would not pay my hard earned money to a state have someone slander my name & reputation. I

  4. excellent discussion going on here. Very enlightening.

  5. I normally do not leave comments but I like this show soo much! I bookmarked your site on dig!

  6. messedup

    maybe bad but these freaks live close to me… dont like it

  7. They aren’t all freaks, they are people, they may be different but they are still people. Yes let’s be aware of legitimate sex offenders, but Men convicted of having homosexual sex in a state that prohibits such an act isn’t a threat to anyone except maybe a court room clerk. This disgusts me. This app should be taken down and remedied immediately,

  8. Wow, that’s feature are very cool. It will be very useful for woman who are traveling alone. Apple really are doing some big changes that made their customer/client to embrace their product.

  9. Maybe we should call all gay people as sex offenders? Absurd and stupid imo

  10. What a stupid idea, since when was being gay against the law.

  11. I disagree with Jaime, might not be so cool if the wrong people get accused of such things. Sex offense is a serious matter in my opinion. Time will tell I guess. good article

  12. this is soo stupid. Cant belive apple really did that…

  13. This app has both good and bad effects. Yes indeed it’s helpful and informative but it somehow iviolates people’s (gays) right to privacy. Imagine the situation where you are at a cafe and this app tells you there’s one sex offender around you. Then you freak out only to find out that the person just committed a minor offense. What a big embarrassment!

  14. maybe bad but these freaks live close to me… dont like it

Leave a Reply

Theme by Anders Norén